H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patty Fendick vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 1-1
Patty Fendick and Leila Meskhi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on clay, while Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1992 Amelia Island fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1992* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 6-2 6-2 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1988* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-0 6-3 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patty Fendick | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |