H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patty Fendick vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-2
Mareen Louie Harper holds a 2–1 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mareen Louie Harper leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1991 Palm Springs second round 7-6 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 65
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1991* | Palm Springs | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Mareen Louie Harper | 7-6 3-2 (ret.) | Patty Fendick | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1988* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mareen Louie Harper | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1987* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mareen Louie Harper | — | — | — | 1,911 | 177 | 239 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patty Fendick | Mareen Louie Harper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |