H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Patty Fendick vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-2

Mareen Louie Harper holds a 2–1 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mareen Louie Harper leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1991 Indian Wells Open round of 64 7-6 3-2 RET.

USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mareen Louie Harper 7-6 3-2 (ret.) Patty Fendick #69 Match data Feb 25, 1991 R64 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Mareen Louie Harper 3-6 6-2 6-3 Patty Fendick #22 Match data Apr 29, 1988* R16 Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 Carpet
Patty Fendick #86 6-4 5-7 6-2 Mareen Louie Harper Match data Aug 12, 1987* R64 Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patty Fendick — #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,911 179 240 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Fendick Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 1978 9–13 40.9% — 1,599 0 0
18 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,575 0 0
19 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,719 0 0
20 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,745 0 0
21 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,656 0 0
22 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,672 0 0
23 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,734 0 1
24 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,777 0 2
25 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,680 0 2
26 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,689 0 3 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,778 0 3 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,690 0 3 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patty Fendick Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1984 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1986 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1987 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1988 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1989 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1991 9 13 22 40.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1993 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1994 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 93 222 58.1% 10 14 24 41.7% 39 31 70 55.7% 21 24 45 46.7% — 106 119 225 47.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patty Fendick Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.37
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1520 116.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 1982 1500 107.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.32 1978 1599 122.7 — — — — +32 -41 — 39.2% -0.96 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.4 +0.50
18 1983 1430 95.2 — — — — +124 +82 — 27.3% -1.46 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +1.00 1979 1576 121.8 — — — — +27 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.40
19 1984 1471 109.1 — — — — +101 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.32 1980 1719 129.4 — — — — -38 -158 -41 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.4 +1.11
20 1985 1551 125.3 — — — — +52 — +32 47.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.31 1981 1746 134.8 — — — — -2 — -75 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -1.67
21 1986 1643 127.6 — — — — -8 — -4 58.6% +1.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.36 1982 1656 125.3 — — — — -25 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.44
22 1987 1674 134.6 — — — — -14 — -12 47.5% +0.10 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — -0.41 1983 1672 132.3 — — — — -12 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.3 -0.96
23 1988 1798 142.3 — — — — +12 — -57 68.9% +1.29 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +4.30 1984 1734 127.7 — — — — +24 — -95 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.48
24 1989 1763 138.7 — — — — +29 — -46 62.3% +0.83 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +2.23 1985 1778 143.9 — — — — +52 — -156 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.23
25 1990 1740 136.1 — — — — +4 — +11 54.8% +0.16 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.10 1986 1680 121.3 — — — — +20 — -64 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.36
26 1991 1690 123.1 — — — — -46 -90 +29 47.3% -0.30 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.64 1987 1624 119.6 — — — — +7 — -16 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.21
27 1992 1779 141.8 — — — — -33 -186 +25 51.9% +0.05 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.9 -0.86 1988 1614 129.2 — — — — +12 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.37
28 1993 1840 147.9 — — — — -10 — +29 62.1% +0.58 5–6 (45%) 8–0 (100%) 104.7 -0.37 1989 1577 117.4 — — — — -17 — -22 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.28
29 1994 1725 142.3 — — — — +38 — +70 55.9% +0.41 5–11 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.7 +0.50 1990 1591 128.5 — — — — +9 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 1995 1691 136.0 — — — — +70 -105 +56 51.7% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.2 -0.51 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1545 105.5 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1883 144.9 — — — — +11 -96 +4 56.2% +0.38 45–57 (44%) 39–27 (59%) 101.0 +2.02 — 1911 135.4 — — — — +8 -84 -60 42.6% -0.56 76–57 (57%) 41–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.