H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patty Fendick vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 1-0
Patty Fendick holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1988 Phoenix third round 6-7 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1988* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-7 7-6 6-4 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Patty Fendick | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |