H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Patty Fendick vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 1-4

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 4–1 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1995 Indian Wells fourth round 6-7 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 3, 1995* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #19 6-7 6-3 6-2 Patty Fendick #61 Match data
Oct 20, 1994* Brighton WTA 250 R32 Carpet Patty Fendick #48 4-6 6-3 6-2 Mary Joe Fernandez #11 Match data
Sep 1, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #11 6-2 2-6 7-6 Patty Fendick #39 Match data
Jan 22, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-4 6-1 Patty Fendick #51 Match data
Jun 21, 1990* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #9 6-7 7-6 3-0 (ret.) Patty Fendick #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Fendick Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,690 0 3 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,779 0 3 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,691 0 3 — — — — — — —