H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patty Fendick vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 2-1
Patty Fendick holds a 2–1 lead over Natalia Medvedeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1993 Brighton fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1993* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Patty Fendick | 6-3 6-3 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1990* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Natalia Medvedeva | 6-3 6-3 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1988* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-4 7-6 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patty Fendick | Natalia Medvedeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |