H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Patty Fendick vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 0-1

Nathalie Herreman holds a 1–0 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1988 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-4 1-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #79 6-4 1-6 6-1 Patty Fendick #23 Match data Jun 15, 1988* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Fendick Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,550 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,739 0 3 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,689 0 3 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,778 0 3 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,724 0 3 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patty Fendick Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1984 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1986 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1987 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1988 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1989 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1991 9 13 22 40.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1994 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 93 222 58.1% 10 14 24 41.7% 39 31 70 55.7% 21 24 45 46.7% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patty Fendick Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1982 1500 107.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.32 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1983 1430 95.2 — — — — +124 +81 — 27.3% -1.46 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +0.97 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1984 1471 109.1 — — — — +101 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.32 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1985 1551 125.3 — — — — +52 — +31 47.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.32 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1986 1643 127.4 — — — — -7 — -4 58.6% +1.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.36 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1987 1674 134.5 — — — — -15 — -12 47.5% +0.10 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — -0.36 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1988 1798 142.2 — — — — +11 — -57 68.9% +1.29 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +4.37 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1989 1763 138.6 — — — — +28 — -46 62.3% +0.83 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +2.33 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1990 1740 136.0 — — — — +3 — +11 54.8% +0.16 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.10 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1991 1690 123.1 — — — — -46 -91 +29 47.3% -0.30 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.64 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1992 1779 141.8 — — — — -32 -186 +25 51.9% +0.05 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.9 -0.86 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1993 1839 147.9 — — — — -9 — +30 62.1% +0.58 5–6 (45%) 8–0 (100%) 104.7 -0.37 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 1994 1725 142.2 — — — — +38 — +70 55.9% +0.41 5–11 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.7 +0.50 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
30 1995 1691 135.9 — — — — +70 -105 +56 51.7% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.2 -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1883 144.8 — — — — +11 -97 +4 56.2% +0.38 45–57 (44%) 39–27 (59%) 101.0 +2.07 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.