H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Patty Fendick vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 1-0

Patty Fendick holds a 1–0 lead over Noelle Van Lottum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1994 Key Biscayne round of 64 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Noelle Van Lottum
FRA Age 54

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patty Fendick #27 6-3 6-3 Noelle Van Lottum Match data Mar 13, 1994* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Noelle Van Lottum — — — 1,646 56 96 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Fendick Noelle Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1988 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–2 60.0% — 1,533 0 0
17 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 1990 3–2 60.0% — 1,580 0 0
18 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0 1991 8–15 34.8% — 1,531 0 0
19 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0 1992 17–20 45.9% — 1,610 0 1
20 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,550 0 0 1993 13–21 38.2% — 1,582 0 1
21 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0 1994 7–12 36.8% — 1,575 0 1
22 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0 1995 1–9 10.0% — 1,465 0 1
23 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2 1996 0–2 0.0% — 1,441 0 1
24 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3 1997 2–9 18.2% — 1,426 0 1
25 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,739 0 3 1998 1–2 33.3% — 1,428 0 1
26 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,689 0 3 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,416 0 1
27 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,778 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,724 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patty Fendick Noelle Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1984 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1986 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1988 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1991 9 13 22 40.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 93 222 58.1% 10 14 24 41.7% 39 31 70 55.7% 21 24 45 46.7% — 25 41 66 37.9% 22 40 62 35.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 9 7 16 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patty Fendick Noelle Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1507 102.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.28
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1533 105.7 — — — — +43 — — 53.3% +0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.90
17 1982 1500 107.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.32 1990 1581 116.6 — — — — +44 — — 60.0% -0.10 — 1–0 — +0.14
18 1983 1430 95.2 — — — — +124 +81 — 27.3% -1.46 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +0.97 1991 1532 111.1 — — — — +43 +16 — 38.8% -0.80 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
19 1984 1471 109.1 — — — — +101 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.32 1992 1610 125.2 — — — — +39 -43 — 48.1% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 5–1 (83%) 101.6 +1.96
20 1985 1551 125.3 — — — — +52 — +31 47.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.32 1993 1583 123.6 — — — — +35 -30 — 40.7% -0.57 6–9 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 +0.33
21 1986 1643 127.4 — — — — -7 — -4 58.6% +1.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.36 1994 1576 110.9 — — — — +14 +11 — 40.0% -1.15 4–2 (67%) — — -0.09
22 1987 1674 134.5 — — — — -15 — -12 47.5% +0.10 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — -0.36 1995 1465 92.1 — — — — +55 +58 — 11.1% -3.06 0–2 2–0 — +0.63
23 1988 1798 142.2 — — — — +11 — -57 68.9% +1.29 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +4.37 1996 1442 96.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.13
24 1989 1763 138.6 — — — — +28 — -46 62.3% +0.83 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +2.33 1997 1427 107.1 — — — — +69 +66 +36 26.9% -1.35 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.01
25 1990 1740 136.0 — — — — +3 — +11 54.8% +0.16 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.10 1998 1429 97.9 — — — — — +33 — 44.4% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.19
26 1991 1690 123.1 — — — — -46 -91 +29 47.3% -0.30 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.64 1999 1416 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
27 1992 1779 141.8 — — — — -32 -186 +25 51.9% +0.05 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.9 -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1839 147.9 — — — — -9 — +30 62.1% +0.58 5–6 (45%) 8–0 (100%) 104.7 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1725 142.2 — — — — +38 — +70 55.9% +0.41 5–11 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.7 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1691 135.9 — — — — +70 -105 +56 51.7% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.2 -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1883 144.8 — — — — +11 -97 +4 56.2% +0.38 45–57 (44%) 39–27 (59%) 101.0 +2.07 — 1646 119.1 — — — — +39 -1 +36 40.7% -0.78 20–29 (41%) 12–11 (52%) 99.0 +3.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.