H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patty Fendick vs Petra Langrova H2H: 1-0
Patty Fendick holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Langrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1989 Sydney third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 56
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1989* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-2 6-3 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patty Fendick | Petra Langrova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |