H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patty Fendick vs Rene Simpson H2H: 1-1
Patty Fendick and Rene Simpson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rene Simpson leads 1–0 on clay, while Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rene Simpson won the 1992 Houston third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1992* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Rene Simpson | 7-5 7-5 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1989* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-1 6-2 | Rene Simpson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Rene Simpson | #546 | #70 | 256 | 1,663 | 44 | 83 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patty Fendick | Rene Simpson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #132 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #109 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #180 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #132 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #122 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #154 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |