H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Patty Fendick vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-1

Sandra Cecchini holds a 1–0 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1983 Perugia round of 64 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini 6-4 6-2 Patty Fendick Match data May 4, 1983* R64 Perugia WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Fendick Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,550 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,739 0 3 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,689 0 3 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,778 0 3 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,724 0 3 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,690 0 3 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patty Fendick Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1984 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1986 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1987 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1988 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1989 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1991 9 13 22 40.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1993 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1994 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 93 222 58.1% 10 14 24 41.7% 39 31 70 55.7% 21 24 45 46.7% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patty Fendick Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 1982 1500 107.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.32 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 1983 1430 95.2 — — — — +124 +81 — 27.3% -1.46 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +0.97 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 1984 1471 109.1 — — — — +101 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.32 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1985 1551 125.3 — — — — +52 — +31 47.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.32 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1986 1643 127.4 — — — — -7 — -4 58.6% +1.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.36 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1987 1674 134.5 — — — — -15 — -12 47.5% +0.10 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — -0.36 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1988 1798 142.2 — — — — +11 — -57 68.9% +1.29 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +4.37 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 1989 1763 138.6 — — — — +28 — -46 62.3% +0.83 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +2.33 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1990 1740 136.0 — — — — +3 — +11 54.8% +0.16 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.10 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1991 1690 123.1 — — — — -46 -91 +29 47.3% -0.30 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.64 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1992 1779 141.8 — — — — -32 -186 +25 51.9% +0.05 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.9 -0.86 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 1993 1839 147.9 — — — — -9 — +30 62.1% +0.58 5–6 (45%) 8–0 (100%) 104.7 -0.37 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 1994 1725 142.2 — — — — +38 — +70 55.9% +0.41 5–11 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.7 +0.50 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 1995 1691 135.9 — — — — +70 -105 +56 51.7% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.2 -0.51 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1883 144.8 — — — — +11 -97 +4 56.2% +0.38 45–57 (44%) 39–27 (59%) 101.0 +2.07 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.