H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patty Fendick vs Susan Sloane Lundy H2H: 3-1
Patty Fendick holds a 3–1 lead over Susan Sloane Lundy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patty Fendick leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1990 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Patty Fendick | 6-2 6-4 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
| Sep 16, 1988* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-0 1-0 (ret.) | Patty Fendick | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1988* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-1 6-3 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1988* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-2 6-4 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,884 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Patty Fendick | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |