H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Patty Schnyder vs Cara Black H2H: 0-2
Cara Black holds a 2–0 lead over Patty Schnyder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cara Black leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cara Black won the 2001 Roland Garros second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 47
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Cara Black | 6-2 7-5 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Cara Black | 6-7 7-5 6-3 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Schnyder | #278 | #7 | 3,050 | 1,987 | 492 | 346 | 58.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patty Schnyder | Cara Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #26 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #11 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #25 | 1,751 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,734 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #15 | 1,848 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,818 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #14 | 1,793 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #7 | 1,928 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2006 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #9 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,879 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #14 | 1,827 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #44 | 1,799 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #55 | 1,667 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #324 | 1,631 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #278 | 1,597 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |