H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Patty Schnyder vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 3-1
Patty Schnyder holds a 3–1 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Patty Schnyder leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Schnyder won the 2006 Moscow third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 47
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Patty Schnyder | 6-3 6-0 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2006* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 6-2 6-2 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2006* | Luxembourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 6-0 6-3 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1997* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Chanda Rubin | 7-5 6-0 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Schnyder | #278 | #7 | 3,050 | 1,987 | 492 | 346 | 58.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,047 | 343 | 231 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patty Schnyder | Chanda Rubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #26 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #11 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,989 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #25 | 1,751 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,734 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #15 | 1,848 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,818 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2004 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #14 | 1,793 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2005 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #7 | 1,928 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2006 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #9 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2007 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,879 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #52 | 1,860 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2008 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #14 | 1,827 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,823 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,719 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #44 | 1,799 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #55 | 1,667 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #324 | 1,631 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #278 | 1,597 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |