H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Patty Schnyder vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 3-5

Conchita Martínez holds a 5–3 lead over Patty Schnyder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 2–1 on clay, while Patty Schnyder leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Schnyder won the 2005 US Open first round 4-6 6-4 6-2.

SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 31, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Patty Schnyder #11 4-6 6-4 6-2 Conchita Martínez #37 Match data
Apr 17, 2004* Charleston WTA 1000 SF Clay Conchita Martínez #24 6-4 6-3 Patty Schnyder #17 Match data
Oct 19, 2002* Zurich WTA 1000 SF Hard Patty Schnyder #19 6-0 6-3 Conchita Martínez #47 Match data
Jun 28, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Conchita Martínez #66 6-1 6-3 Patty Schnyder #18 Match data
May 4, 2001* Hamburg WTA 500 R16 Clay Patty Schnyder #46 6-3 2-6 6-2 Conchita Martínez #9 Match data
Mar 23, 2000* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Conchita Martínez #7 7-5 6-4 Patty Schnyder #25 Match data
Oct 31, 1997* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Conchita Martínez #10 7-5 2-6 6-1 Patty Schnyder #28 Match data
May 10, 1997* Rome WTA 1000 SF Clay Conchita Martínez #6 6-2 6-2 Patty Schnyder #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,987 492 346 58.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Schnyder Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1996 7–9 43.8% #64 1,587 0 0 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,710 0 0 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,910 0 5 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,818 0 8 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 2004 31–22 58.5% #14 1,793 0 8 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,928 0 10 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,898 0 10 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,879 0 10 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2008 33–21 61.1% #14 1,827 0 11 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,755 0 11 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,667 0 11 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33
37 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11
38 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,627 0 11
39 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11