H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Patty Schnyder vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 4-0

Patty Schnyder holds a 4–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patty Schnyder leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patty Schnyder won the 2008 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Patty Schnyder #15 6-3 6-3 Lilia Osterloh #91 Match data
Jul 20, 2006* Cincinnati WTA 500 R32 Hard Patty Schnyder #8 5-7 6-2 7-6(1) Lilia Osterloh #108 Match data
Apr 4, 2002* Sarasota WTA 250 R32 Clay Patty Schnyder #34 6-0 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #57 Match data
Jan 19, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Patty Schnyder #29 6-3 6-4 Lilia Osterloh #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,987 492 346 58.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Schnyder Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 7–9 43.8% #64 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,710 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,910 0 5 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0
20 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0
23 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0
24 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,818 0 8 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2004 31–22 58.5% #14 1,793 0 8 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0
26 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,928 0 10 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,898 0 10 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,879 0 10 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2008 33–21 61.1% #14 1,827 0 11 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,755 0 11 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,667 0 11 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0
37 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11 — — — — — — —
38 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,627 0 11 — — — — — — —
39 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11 — — — — — — —