H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Patty Schnyder vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-0

Patty Schnyder holds a 1–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patty Schnyder leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patty Schnyder won the 1998 Charleston Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patty Schnyder #18 6-3 6-2 Lori Mcneil #148 Match data Apr 2, 1998* R32 Charleston Open WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patty Schnyder — #7 3,050 1,994 495 349 58.6% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Schnyder Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1996 7–10 41.2% #64 1,586 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,709 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,911 0 5 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,809 0 8 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #14 1,808 0 8 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,932 0 10 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,889 0 10 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,885 0 10 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2008 34–22 60.7% #14 1,821 0 11 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,754 0 11 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 2011 3–9 25.0% — 1,668 0 11 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11
37 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,632 0 11 — — — — — — —
38 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,628 0 11 — — — — — — —
39 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patty Schnyder Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 9 9 18 50.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 17 9 26 65.4% 27 6 33 81.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1999 16 10 26 61.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2000 15 11 26 57.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 2001 11 10 21 52.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 2003 14 9 23 60.9% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 2005 42 17 59 71.2% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2006 30 15 45 66.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 2007 30 18 48 62.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 2008 25 16 41 61.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 2009 8 12 20 40.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 2010 11 9 20 55.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264 175 439 60.1% 188 120 308 61.0% 15 21 36 41.7% 28 33 61 45.9% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patty Schnyder Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1995 1527 112.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — -0.07 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1996 1586 120.2 — — — — -33 +52 — 40.5% -0.76 5–3 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 105.4 -0.06 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1997 1710 151.6 — — — — -46 +9 — 50.0% +0.26 1–11 (8%) 4–5 (44%) 90.4 -0.80 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1998 1912 159.5 — — — — -71 +102 — 67.3% +1.24 15–11 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 109.8 -0.07 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1999 1794 148.8 — — — — +33 +78 — 54.3% -0.08 13–12 (52%) 8–1 (89%) 102.0 -0.17 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 2000 1751 142.6 — — — — +23 +53 -184 53.4% +0.31 11–8 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 -1.05 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23
22 2001 1735 129.7 — — — — -25 +32 -131 53.1% -0.08 7–14 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.1 +0.22 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25
23 2002 1848 146.2 — — — — -30 -40 -257 53.7% +0.32 15–7 (68%) 10–5 (67%) 109.0 -1.16 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70
24 2003 1810 143.5 +3.50 +0.33 1.160 53.0% +28 -43 — 51.4% +0.06 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 100.7 +0.37 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98
25 2004 1809 142.7 +3.52 +0.81 1.159 52.9% +2 +9 -222 59.7% +0.61 12–8 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 +1.41 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28
26 2005 1932 158.1 +2.86 +1.20 1.093 51.8% -18 +31 — 66.2% +1.20 19–17 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 99.0 +3.23 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 2006 1890 156.1 +3.89 +1.47 1.148 53.0% +35 +25 — 62.8% +0.85 10–8 (56%) 12–7 (63%) 102.4 +1.42 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 2007 1886 151.5 +4.70 +1.91 1.163 53.3% -17 +90 -215 61.6% +1.02 13–13 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 94.4 +2.23 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 2008 1821 141.6 +3.54 +0.46 1.097 51.8% -3 +98 — 57.7% +0.47 11–9 (55%) 10–3 (77%) 102.4 +2.47 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 2009 1754 137.5 +1.61 -0.95 0.991 49.8% -10 +115 — 49.0% -0.07 7–5 (58%) 8–2 (80%) 103.6 -1.37 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 2010 1799 133.6 -0.01 -0.10 0.972 49.4% -35 +64 — 51.0% +0.09 12–2 (86%) 3–8 (27%) 104.3 -1.95 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 2011 1669 112.9 -2.14 -2.61 0.773 44.9% +66 +62 — 27.6% -1.34 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.02 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
37 2016 1632 99.5 -0.77 +0.04 1.027 50.7% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 1628 107.6 -0.85 -0.91 1.035 50.3% — — — 50.0% +0.34 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 1598 111.4 -1.17 -1.12 0.861 46.5% — +29 — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 0–1 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 151.9 +2.71 +0.57 1.069 51.4% -7 +45 -201 56.6% +0.46 164–136 (55%) 110–75 (59%) 105.6 +0.55 — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.