H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Patty Schnyder vs Mary Pierce H2H: 2-7

Mary Pierce holds a 7–2 lead over Patty Schnyder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2006 Paris semifinal 6-4 6-2.

SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 7
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 11, 2006* Paris WTA 500 SF Carpet Mary Pierce #6 6-4 6-2 Patty Schnyder #9 Match data
Aug 6, 2005* San Diego WTA 1000 QF Hard Mary Pierce #14 6-4 6-3 Patty Schnyder #11 Match data
May 31, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Mary Pierce #23 6-1 1-6 6-4 Patty Schnyder #10 Match data
May 16, 2002* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Mary Pierce #172 6-3 1-6 6-2 Patty Schnyder #20 Match data
Apr 19, 2002* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Patty Schnyder #30 7-6(4) 6-2 Mary Pierce #232 Match data
Jan 9, 1999* Hope Island WTA 250 F Hard Patty Schnyder #11 4-6 7-6 6-2 Mary Pierce #7 Match data
May 1, 1997* Hamburg WTA 250 R32 Clay Mary Pierce #15 6-1 6-1 Patty Schnyder #49 Match data
Jun 26, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Mary Pierce #14 6-3 6-2 Patty Schnyder #87 Match data
Oct 6, 1995* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Mary Pierce #4 6-1 6-3 Patty Schnyder #234 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,987 492 346 58.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Schnyder Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1996 7–9 43.8% #64 1,587 0 0 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,710 0 0 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,910 0 5 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,818 0 8 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2004 31–22 58.5% #14 1,793 0 8 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,928 0 10 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,898 0 10 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,879 0 10 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2008 33–21 61.1% #14 1,827 0 11 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,755 0 11 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18
32 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,667 0 11
37 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11
38 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,627 0 11
39 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11