H2H data updated: 2026-11-05 00:00 UTC

Patty Schnyder vs Meike Babel H2H: 1-0

Patty Schnyder holds a 1–0 lead over Meike Babel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patty Schnyder leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patty Schnyder won the 1998 Madrid Open round of 16 4-6 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Meike Babel
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patty Schnyder #19 4-6 6-0 6-2 Meike Babel #69 Match data May 22, 1998* R16 Madrid Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patty Schnyder — #7 3,050 1,994 495 349 58.6% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Meike Babel — #27 377 1,784 71 86 45.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Schnyder Meike Babel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0 1991 0–2 0.0% #134 1,486 0 0
17 1996 7–10 41.2% #64 1,586 0 0 1992 10–18 35.7% #86 1,523 0 0
18 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,709 0 0 1993 17–15 53.1% #49 1,616 0 0
19 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,911 0 5 1994 13–12 52.0% #46 1,660 0 0
20 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6 1995 14–10 58.3% #32 1,751 0 0
21 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6 — — — — — — —
22 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7 1997 7–8 46.7% #116 1,702 0 0
23 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8 1998 9–16 36.0% #100 1,643 0 0
24 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,809 0 8 — — — — — — —
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #14 1,808 0 8 2000 1–5 16.7% #425 1,571 0 0
26 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,932 0 10 — — — — — — —
27 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,889 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,885 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2008 34–22 60.7% #14 1,821 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,754 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2011 3–9 25.0% — 1,668 0 11 — — — — — — —
37 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,632 0 11 — — — — — — —
38 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,628 0 11 — — — — — — —
39 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patty Schnyder Meike Babel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 4 10 14 28.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1997 9 9 18 50.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 6 4 10 60.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1998 17 9 26 65.4% 27 6 33 81.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
20 1999 16 10 26 61.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 4 3 7 57.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2000 15 11 26 57.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 11 10 21 52.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2003 14 9 23 60.9% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2005 42 17 59 71.2% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 30 15 45 66.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 30 18 48 62.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 25 16 41 61.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 8 12 20 40.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 11 9 20 55.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264 175 439 60.1% 188 120 308 61.0% 15 21 36 41.7% 28 33 61 45.9% — 20 31 51 39.2% 40 42 82 48.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patty Schnyder Meike Babel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1995 1527 112.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — -0.07 1991 1486 116.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.11
17 1996 1586 120.2 — — — — -33 +52 — 40.5% -0.76 5–3 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 105.4 -0.06 1992 1524 111.1 — — — — 0 +43 — 36.1% -1.25 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) 106.5 +0.29
18 1997 1710 151.6 — — — — -46 +9 — 50.0% +0.26 1–11 (8%) 4–5 (44%) 90.4 -0.80 1993 1617 122.8 — — — — -68 +61 — 46.9% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.80
19 1998 1912 159.5 — — — — -71 +102 — 67.3% +1.24 15–11 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 109.8 -0.07 1994 1660 133.6 — — — — -29 -5 — 55.6% +0.56 2–4 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 95.6 +1.21
20 1999 1794 148.8 — — — — +33 +78 — 54.3% -0.08 13–12 (52%) 8–1 (89%) 102.0 -0.17 1995 1752 137.0 — — — — -21 -74 — 59.3% +0.56 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.5 -2.02
21 2000 1751 142.6 — — — — +23 +53 -184 53.4% +0.31 11–8 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 1735 129.7 — — — — -25 +32 -131 53.1% -0.08 7–14 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.1 +0.22 1997 1703 118.4 — — — — -34 +27 — 40.0% -0.43 2–0 0–5 (0%) — +0.22
23 2002 1848 146.2 — — — — -30 -40 -257 53.7% +0.32 15–7 (68%) 10–5 (67%) 109.0 -1.16 1998 1644 129.8 — — — — +2 +56 — 42.9% -0.63 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — -1.62
24 2003 1810 143.5 +3.50 +0.33 1.160 53.0% +28 -43 — 51.4% +0.06 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 100.7 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 1809 142.7 +3.52 +0.81 1.159 52.9% +2 +9 -222 59.7% +0.61 12–8 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 +1.41 2000 1572 85.7 — — — — — +26 — 15.4% -2.62 1–0 0–1 — +0.31
26 2005 1932 158.1 +2.86 +1.20 1.093 51.8% -18 +31 — 66.2% +1.20 19–17 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 99.0 +3.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 1890 156.1 +3.89 +1.47 1.148 53.0% +35 +25 — 62.8% +0.85 10–8 (56%) 12–7 (63%) 102.4 +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1886 151.5 +4.70 +1.91 1.163 53.3% -17 +90 -215 61.6% +1.02 13–13 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 94.4 +2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1821 141.6 +3.54 +0.46 1.097 51.8% -3 +98 — 57.7% +0.47 11–9 (55%) 10–3 (77%) 102.4 +2.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1754 137.5 +1.61 -0.95 0.991 49.8% -10 +115 — 49.0% -0.07 7–5 (58%) 8–2 (80%) 103.6 -1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 1799 133.6 -0.01 -0.10 0.972 49.4% -35 +64 — 51.0% +0.09 12–2 (86%) 3–8 (27%) 104.3 -1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2011 1669 112.9 -2.14 -2.61 0.773 44.9% +66 +62 — 27.6% -1.34 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 1632 99.5 -0.77 +0.04 1.027 50.7% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 1628 106.5 -0.85 -0.91 1.035 50.3% — — — 50.0% +0.34 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 1598 111.4 -1.17 -1.12 0.861 46.5% — +29 — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 0–1 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 152.0 +2.71 +0.57 1.069 51.4% -7 +45 -201 56.6% +0.46 164–136 (55%) 110–75 (59%) 105.6 +0.55 — 1784 130.2 — — — — -24 +23 — 45.5% -0.38 18–18 (50%) 8–17 (32%) 98.2 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.