H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Patty Schnyder vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 4-4

Patty Schnyder and Nathalie Dechy are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Patty Schnyder leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2009 Paris fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-3.

SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 13, 2009* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Nathalie Dechy #58 3-6 6-4 6-3 Patty Schnyder #16 Match data
Oct 27, 2006* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Patty Schnyder #9 6-7(1) 6-4 6-3 Nathalie Dechy #42 Match data
Apr 15, 2006* Charleston WTA 1000 QF Clay Patty Schnyder #9 6-0 6-3 Nathalie Dechy #24 Match data
Jan 27, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Nathalie Dechy #25 5-7 6-1 7-5 Patty Schnyder #14 Match data
Jan 28, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Patty Schnyder #26 6-2 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #28 Match data
Jan 9, 2004* Gold Coast WTA 250 R16 Hard Nathalie Dechy #34 (w/o) Patty Schnyder #25 Match data
Jun 23, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nathalie Dechy #29 5-7 6-3 6-3 Patty Schnyder #19 Match data
Jan 21, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Patty Schnyder #25 6-1 6-2 Nathalie Dechy #83 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,987 492 346 58.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Schnyder Nathalie Dechy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 1996 7–9 43.8% #64 1,587 0 0 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0
18 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,710 0 0 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0
19 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,910 0 5 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0
20 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0
21 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0
22 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0
23 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0
24 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,818 0 8 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1
25 2004 31–22 58.5% #14 1,793 0 8 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1
26 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,928 0 10 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1
27 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,898 0 10 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1
28 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,879 0 10 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1
29 2008 33–21 61.1% #14 1,827 0 11 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,755 0 11 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11
32 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,667 0 11
37 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11
38 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,627 0 11
39 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11