H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Patty Schnyder vs Samantha Reeves H2H: 0-1

Samantha Reeves holds a 1–0 lead over Patty Schnyder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Samantha Reeves leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Samantha Reeves won the 2002 Miami Open round of 64 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Samantha Reeves
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Samantha Reeves #98 6-4 6-0 Patty Schnyder #34 Match data Mar 20, 2002* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,984 495 350 58.6% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Samantha Reeves #864 #62 523 1,629 30 59 33.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Schnyder Samantha Reeves
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 7–10 41.2% #64 1,586 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,709 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 51–20 71.8% #11 1,903 0 5 1998 2–8 20.0% #111 1,480 0 0
20 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,792 0 6 1999 4–8 33.3% #121 1,480 0 0
21 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,750 0 6 2000 1–4 20.0% #171 1,446 0 0
22 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7 2001 4–3 57.1% #106 1,515 0 0
23 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8 2002 8–14 36.4% #108 1,544 0 0
24 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,809 0 8 2003 8–10 44.4% #74 1,588 0 0
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #14 1,808 0 8 2004 3–12 20.0% #198 1,526 0 0
26 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,932 0 10 — — — — — — —
27 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,889 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,885 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2008 34–22 60.7% #14 1,820 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,754 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,798 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,668 0 11 — — — — — — —
37 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11 — — — — — — —
38 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,628 0 11 — — — — — — —
39 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patty Schnyder Samantha Reeves
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 9 9 18 50.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 17 9 26 65.4% 27 6 33 81.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1999 16 10 26 61.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2000 15 11 26 57.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2001 11 10 21 52.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 5 7 12 41.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2003 14 9 23 60.9% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2003 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2005 42 17 59 71.2% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 30 15 45 66.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 30 18 48 62.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 25 16 41 61.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 8 12 20 40.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 11 9 20 55.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264 175 439 60.1% 188 120 308 61.0% 15 22 37 40.5% 28 33 61 45.9% — 14 27 41 34.1% 11 22 33 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 311/496 of Patty Schnyder's and 8/33 of Samantha Reeves's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Patty Schnyder Samantha Reeves
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2003 7/51 2.3 1.3 62.4% 65.7% 61.0% 60.5% 42.0% 63.0% 42.9% 2003 5/18 1.0 7.0 61.8% 57.8% 37.8% 49.5% 49.5% 50.1% 43.0%
25 2004 12/56 3.3 3.0 61.5% 66.1% 51.6% 45.1% 45.4% 60.7% 45.6% 2004 3/15 1.7 7.0 61.2% 44.9% 29.9% 42.6% 32.1% 39.1% 37.1%
26 2005 20/83 3.7 2.4 60.5% 64.6% 49.7% 59.6% 51.8% 58.6% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 50/72 3.8 2.2 63.4% 65.7% 51.4% 61.6% 49.7% 60.3% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 66/71 3.2 2.3 65.5% 66.1% 52.0% 58.4% 49.6% 61.1% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 51/56 2.6 2.4 63.7% 64.1% 50.4% 55.4% 43.9% 59.2% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 42/43 2.5 2.5 61.8% 61.6% 51.0% 56.5% 52.6% 57.4% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 44/45 2.2 2.3 63.9% 60.2% 47.9% 54.6% 45.7% 55.7% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2011 12/12 1.8 2.6 61.5% 55.2% 44.6% 47.4% 46.7% 51.2% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 1/1 1.0 3.0 58.2% 54.7% 41.3% 66.7% 57.1% 49.1% 52.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 2/2 3.5 3.5 64.6% 64.7% 55.9% 67.9% 30.6% 61.7% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 4/4 1.0 2.3 66.7% 59.9% 44.0% 41.5% 33.6% 54.4% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 311/845 2.9 2.4 63.4% 63.6% 50.6% 56.7% 47.9% 58.7% 44.1% — 8/89 1.3 7.0 61.6% 53.0% 34.9% 46.9% 43.0% 45.9% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patty Schnyder Samantha Reeves
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1995 1527 112.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 1586 120.2 — — — — -33 +52 — 40.5% -0.76 5–3 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 105.4 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 1710 151.6 — — — — -46 +9 — 50.0% +0.26 1–11 (8%) 4–5 (44%) 90.4 -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1903 159.4 — — — — -62 +111 -333 66.7% +1.21 15–12 (56%) 10–5 (67%) 109.2 -0.16 1998 1480 114.3 — — — — +27 +68 — 29.2% -1.17 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.17
20 1999 1792 148.7 — — — — +35 +80 — 54.3% -0.08 13–12 (52%) 8–1 (89%) 102.0 -0.13 1999 1481 106.1 — — — — +28 +49 — 34.6% -1.65 1–1 1–0 — +0.52
21 2000 1751 142.6 — — — — +23 +53 -191 53.4% +0.31 11–8 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 -1.04 2000 1447 92.1 — — — — — +34 — 18.2% -1.45 1–0 0–1 — +0.50
22 2001 1734 129.7 — — — — -24 +33 -136 53.1% -0.08 7–14 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.1 +0.22 2001 1515 113.3 — — — — +30 — — 47.1% +0.12 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.29
23 2002 1848 146.2 — — — — -30 -40 -263 53.7% +0.32 15–7 (68%) 10–5 (67%) 109.0 -1.16 2002 1545 121.7 — — — — +16 -68 — 42.6% -0.48 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -0.91
24 2003 1810 143.5 +3.50 +0.33 1.160 53.0% +28 -43 — 51.4% +0.06 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 100.7 +0.37 2003 1589 112.2 -1.00 +0.72 0.861 46.5% -29 -69 +14 41.0% -0.92 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.54
25 2004 1809 142.7 +3.52 +0.81 1.159 52.9% +2 +9 -226 59.7% +0.61 12–8 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 +1.41 2004 1526 110.0 -3.84 -1.12 0.609 38.9% -9 -32 — 24.2% -1.70 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.74
26 2005 1932 158.1 +2.86 +1.20 1.093 51.8% -18 +31 — 66.2% +1.20 19–17 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 99.0 +3.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 1890 156.1 +3.89 +1.47 1.148 53.0% +35 +25 — 62.8% +0.85 10–8 (56%) 12–7 (63%) 102.4 +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1886 151.5 +4.70 +1.91 1.163 53.3% -17 +90 -218 61.6% +1.02 13–13 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 94.4 +2.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1821 141.5 +3.54 +0.46 1.097 51.8% -3 +98 — 57.7% +0.47 11–9 (55%) 10–3 (77%) 102.4 +2.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1754 137.4 +1.61 -0.95 0.991 49.8% -10 +114 — 49.0% -0.07 7–5 (58%) 8–2 (80%) 103.6 -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 1799 133.5 -0.01 -0.10 0.972 49.4% -35 +64 — 51.0% +0.09 12–2 (86%) 3–8 (27%) 104.3 -1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2011 1668 112.8 -2.14 -2.61 0.773 44.9% +67 +63 — 27.6% -1.34 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 1632 99.5 -0.77 +0.04 1.027 50.7% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 1628 107.6 -0.85 -0.91 1.035 50.3% — — — 50.0% +0.34 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 1597 111.4 -1.17 -1.12 0.861 46.5% — +29 — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 0–1 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1984 151.9 +2.71 +0.57 1.069 51.4% -6 +46 -221 56.5% +0.46 164–137 (54%) 110–75 (59%) 105.5 +0.53 — 1630 116.7 -2.07 +0.03 0.755 43.6% +12 -24 +14 35.8% -0.99 15–15 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 103.4 -1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.