H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patty Schnyder vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 1-1
Patty Schnyder and Sandra Cacic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patty Schnyder leads 1–0 on clay, while Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 2001 Miami second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 47
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2001* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 6-2 6-4 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
| May 2, 1996* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Patty Schnyder | 6-7 6-4 6-2 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Schnyder | #278 | #7 | 3,050 | 1,987 | 492 | 346 | 58.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patty Schnyder | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #26 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #11 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #25 | 1,751 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,734 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #15 | 1,848 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,818 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #14 | 1,793 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #7 | 1,928 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2006 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #9 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,879 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2008 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #14 | 1,827 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #44 | 1,799 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #55 | 1,667 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #324 | 1,631 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #278 | 1,597 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |