H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Patty Schnyder vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 4-3

Patty Schnyder holds a 4–3 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Patty Schnyder leads 3–0 on clay, while Sandrine Testud leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Schnyder won the 2000 Amelia Island third round 7-6(4) 7-6(0).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 13, 2000* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Patty Schnyder #30 7-6(4) 7-6(0) Sandrine Testud #10 Match data
Nov 4, 1999* Leipzig WTA 250 R32 Carpet Sandrine Testud #14 3-6 6-1 6-0 Patty Schnyder #22 Match data
Jul 30, 1999* Stanford WTA 250 R16 Hard Sandrine Testud #17 6-4 6-1 Patty Schnyder #19 Match data
Jan 14, 1999* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Patty Schnyder #8 6-3 3-6 6-2 Sandrine Testud #15 Match data
May 23, 1998* Madrid WTA 1000 SF Clay Patty Schnyder #19 6-4 7-5 Sandrine Testud #14 Match data
May 8, 1997* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Patty Schnyder #51 7-6 6-0 Sandrine Testud #25 Match data
Mar 22, 1997* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sandrine Testud #29 6-4 6-4 Patty Schnyder #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,987 492 346 58.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,019 309 236 56.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Schnyder Sandrine Testud
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 7–9 43.8% #64 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,710 0 0 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0
19 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,910 0 5 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,546 0 0
20 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,566 0 0
21 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,560 0 0
22 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0
23 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0
24 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,818 0 8 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,771 0 0
25 2004 31–22 58.5% #14 1,793 0 8 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,938 0 1
26 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,928 0 10 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,946 0 2
27 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,898 0 10 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2
28 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,879 0 10 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,916 0 2
29 2008 33–21 61.1% #14 1,827 0 11 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,976 0 3
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,755 0 11 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,845 0 3
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,667 0 11 2004 1–7 12.5% #313 1,739 0 3
37 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11 — — — — — — —
38 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,627 0 11 — — — — — — —
39 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11 — — — — — — —