H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Patty Schnyder vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 2-2

Patty Schnyder and Tamarine Tanasugarn are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2003 US Open round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamarine Tanasugarn #39 6-4 6-3 Patty Schnyder #22 Match data Aug 28, 2003* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tamarine Tanasugarn #30 6-2 6-4 Patty Schnyder #41 Match data Jan 11, 2002* QF Canberra Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Patty Schnyder #12 6-3 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #55 Match data Mar 10, 1999* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Patty Schnyder #17 6-0 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #37 Match data Mar 22, 1998* R32 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,984 495 350 58.6% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Schnyder Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 1996 7–10 41.2% #64 1,586 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,709 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 1998 51–20 71.8% #11 1,903 0 5 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,792 0 6 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,750 0 6 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,809 0 8 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #14 1,808 0 8 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,932 0 10 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,889 0 10 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,885 0 10 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 2008 34–22 60.7% #14 1,820 0 11 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,754 0 11 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,798 0 11 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,668 0 11 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
37 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11 — — — — — — —
38 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,628 0 11 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4
39 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patty Schnyder Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 9 9 18 50.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 17 9 26 65.4% 27 6 33 81.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1999 16 10 26 61.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2000 15 11 26 57.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2001 11 10 21 52.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2003 14 9 23 60.9% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2005 42 17 59 71.2% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2006 30 15 45 66.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2007 30 18 48 62.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2008 25 16 41 61.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 2009 8 12 20 40.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2010 11 9 20 55.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
32 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264 175 439 60.1% 188 120 308 61.0% 15 22 37 40.5% 28 33 61 45.9% — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 311/496 of Patty Schnyder's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Patty Schnyder Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2003 7/51 2.3 1.3 62.4% 65.7% 61.0% 60.5% 42.0% 63.0% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 12/56 3.3 3.0 61.5% 66.1% 51.6% 45.1% 45.4% 60.7% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 20/83 3.7 2.4 60.5% 64.6% 49.7% 59.6% 51.8% 58.6% 45.3% 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 2006 50/72 3.8 2.2 63.4% 65.7% 51.4% 61.6% 49.7% 60.3% 45.6% 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 2007 66/71 3.2 2.3 65.5% 66.1% 52.0% 58.4% 49.6% 61.1% 45.3% 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 2008 51/56 2.6 2.4 63.7% 64.1% 50.4% 55.4% 43.9% 59.2% 44.8% 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 2009 42/43 2.5 2.5 61.8% 61.6% 51.0% 56.5% 52.6% 57.4% 42.2% 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 2010 44/45 2.2 2.3 63.9% 60.2% 47.9% 54.6% 45.7% 55.7% 43.1% 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 2011 12/12 1.8 2.6 61.5% 55.2% 44.6% 47.4% 46.7% 51.2% 37.7% 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
37 2016 1/1 1.0 3.0 58.2% 54.7% 41.3% 66.7% 57.1% 49.1% 52.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 2/2 3.5 3.5 64.6% 64.7% 55.9% 67.9% 30.6% 61.7% 39.6% 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
39 2018 4/4 1.0 2.3 66.7% 59.9% 44.0% 41.5% 33.6% 54.4% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 311/845 2.9 2.4 63.4% 63.6% 50.6% 56.7% 47.9% 58.7% 44.1% — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patty Schnyder Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1995 1527 112.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — -0.07 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
17 1996 1586 120.2 — — — — -33 +52 — 40.5% -0.76 5–3 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 105.4 -0.06 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06
18 1997 1710 151.6 — — — — -46 +9 — 50.0% +0.26 1–11 (8%) 4–5 (44%) 90.4 -0.80 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28
19 1998 1903 159.4 — — — — -62 +111 -333 66.7% +1.21 15–12 (56%) 10–5 (67%) 109.2 -0.16 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66
20 1999 1792 148.7 — — — — +35 +80 — 54.3% -0.08 13–12 (52%) 8–1 (89%) 102.0 -0.13 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65
21 2000 1751 142.6 — — — — +23 +53 -191 53.4% +0.31 11–8 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 -1.04 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91
22 2001 1734 129.7 — — — — -24 +33 -136 53.1% -0.08 7–14 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.1 +0.22 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52
23 2002 1848 146.2 — — — — -30 -40 -263 53.7% +0.32 15–7 (68%) 10–5 (67%) 109.0 -1.16 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30
24 2003 1810 143.5 +3.50 +0.33 1.160 53.0% +28 -43 — 51.4% +0.06 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 100.7 +0.37 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28
25 2004 1809 142.7 +3.52 +0.81 1.159 52.9% +2 +9 -226 59.7% +0.61 12–8 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 +1.41 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48
26 2005 1932 158.1 +2.86 +1.20 1.093 51.8% -18 +31 — 66.2% +1.20 19–17 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 99.0 +3.23 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78
27 2006 1890 156.1 +3.89 +1.47 1.148 53.0% +35 +25 — 62.8% +0.85 10–8 (56%) 12–7 (63%) 102.4 +1.42 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55
28 2007 1886 151.5 +4.70 +1.91 1.163 53.3% -17 +90 -218 61.6% +1.02 13–13 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 94.4 +2.16 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91
29 2008 1821 141.5 +3.54 +0.46 1.097 51.8% -3 +98 — 57.7% +0.47 11–9 (55%) 10–3 (77%) 102.4 +2.47 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
30 2009 1754 137.4 +1.61 -0.95 0.991 49.8% -10 +114 — 49.0% -0.07 7–5 (58%) 8–2 (80%) 103.6 -1.38 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05
31 2010 1799 133.5 -0.01 -0.10 0.972 49.4% -35 +64 — 51.0% +0.09 12–2 (86%) 3–8 (27%) 104.3 -1.95 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05
32 2011 1668 112.8 -2.14 -2.61 0.773 44.9% +67 +63 — 27.6% -1.34 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.02 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
37 2016 1632 99.5 -0.77 +0.04 1.027 50.7% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 1628 107.6 -0.85 -0.91 1.035 50.3% — — — 50.0% +0.34 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.25 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05
39 2018 1597 111.4 -1.17 -1.12 0.861 46.5% — +29 — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 0–1 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1984 151.9 +2.71 +0.57 1.069 51.4% -6 +46 -221 56.5% +0.46 164–137 (54%) 110–75 (59%) 105.5 +0.53 — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.