H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Paula Cristina Goncalves vs Sílvia Soler-Espinosa H2H: 0-1
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa holds a 1–0 lead over Paula Cristina Goncalves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sílvia Soler-Espinosa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sílvia Soler-Espinosa won the 2016 Bogota semifinal 6-4 6-7(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 35
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2016* | Bogota | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | Paula Cristina Goncalves | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Cristina Goncalves | #912 | #158 | 364 | 1,537 | 6 | 8 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | #858 | #54 | 1,157 | 1,643 | 56 | 102 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paula Cristina Goncalves | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #168 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #66 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #145 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #681 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |