H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paula Ormaechea vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-1
Paula Ormaechea and Kimiko Date Krumm are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on grass, while Paula Ormaechea leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 2014 Birmingham second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2014* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Kimiko Date Krumm | 6-3 6-1 | Paula Ormaechea | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Paula Ormaechea | 6-3 7-6(7) | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Ormaechea | #793 | #59 | 986 | 1,632 | 28 | 39 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimiko Date Krumm | — | — | — | 2,091 | 241 | 188 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paula Ormaechea | Kimiko Date Krumm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #142 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #62 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #122 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 26–13 | 66.7% | — | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #262 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,987 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | — | 2,029 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 31–13 | 70.5% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #401 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 8 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 8 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 8 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |