H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Carina Witthoeft holds a 2–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carina Witthoeft leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carina Witthoeft won the 2017 Luxembourg semifinal 7-6(2) 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauline Parmentier | 7-5 6-2 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data | Aug 18, 2018 | Q2 | New Haven | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Carina Witthoeft | 7-6(2) 1-6 6-3 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data | Oct 21, 2017* | SF | Luxembourg | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Carina Witthoeft | 6-4 7-6(5) | Pauline Parmentier | Match data | Jun 1, 2017* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,703 | 120 | 188 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,747 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pauline Parmentier | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #61 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,533 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,443 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,439 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,522 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,459 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,683 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,594 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,540 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Pauline Parmentier | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 66 | 99 | 165 | 40.0% | 48 | 70 | 118 | 40.7% | 5 | 17 | 22 | 22.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | Career | 30 | 36 | 66 | 45.5% | 12 | 23 | 35 | 34.3% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 281/306 of Pauline Parmentier's and 112/118 of Carina Witthoeft's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Pauline Parmentier | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2005 | 1/3 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 50.0% | 45.8% | 29.2% | 25.0% | 100.0% | 37.5% | 30.8% | 2012 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 45.9% | 58.8% | 42.5% | 37.5% | 75.0% | 50.0% | 37.7% |
| 2007 | 5/13 | 1.8 | 3.4 | 50.1% | 63.3% | 50.9% | 51.4% | 48.5% | 57.2% | 42.4% | 2013 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 44.4% | 41.3% | 33.3% | 37.5% | 45.0% | 36.9% | 37.9% |
| 2008 | 31/38 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 56.0% | 67.3% | 43.8% | 55.5% | 44.4% | 56.8% | 40.6% | 2014 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 61.8% | 47.1% | 47.6% | 37.5% | 33.3% | 47.3% | 38.9% |
| 2009 | 17/18 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 58.2% | 63.3% | 43.6% | 50.6% | 40.6% | 55.0% | 40.8% | 2015 | 24/30 | 2.8 | 4.9 | 63.3% | 62.1% | 47.8% | 50.1% | 46.2% | 56.8% | 42.9% |
| 2010 | 17/18 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 56.9% | 63.7% | 42.1% | 49.9% | 45.9% | 54.4% | 40.2% | 2016 | 25/25 | 1.9 | 6.0 | 62.3% | 62.1% | 40.4% | 54.6% | 44.5% | 54.1% | 45.0% |
| 2011 | 15/18 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 58.1% | 64.4% | 43.8% | 50.6% | 47.5% | 55.6% | 41.2% | 2017 | 36/36 | 1.4 | 4.0 | 67.8% | 63.2% | 47.3% | 54.6% | 43.1% | 57.9% | 45.1% |
| 2012 | 28/29 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 58.8% | 64.3% | 46.8% | 57.9% | 50.1% | 57.1% | 41.7% | 2018 | 23/23 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 66.2% | 62.3% | 40.3% | 54.4% | 41.6% | 54.9% | 39.1% |
| 2013 | 10/11 | 1.6 | 5.2 | 60.7% | 55.7% | 40.2% | 31.8% | 43.5% | 49.5% | 37.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 17/17 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 57.9% | 64.1% | 38.9% | 43.7% | 43.9% | 53.9% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 11/11 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 58.6% | 60.2% | 50.4% | 45.1% | 41.8% | 55.7% | 35.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 28/28 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 58.0% | 62.4% | 47.0% | 55.3% | 47.8% | 55.8% | 43.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 34/34 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 57.0% | 62.7% | 44.2% | 53.0% | 48.5% | 54.7% | 43.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 31/31 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 60.1% | 63.0% | 43.0% | 55.8% | 43.6% | 55.0% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 32/33 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 58.0% | 63.2% | 43.8% | 52.3% | 41.7% | 55.0% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 4/4 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 58.6% | 59.5% | 34.3% | 42.8% | 50.0% | 49.2% | 39.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 281/308 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 57.9% | 63.3% | 44.0% | 51.9% | 45.6% | 55.1% | 40.9% | Career | 112/118 | 2.0 | 5.1 | 64.6% | 62.0% | 44.1% | 53.0% | 44.0% | 55.7% | 43.1% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Pauline Parmentier | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2005 | 1507 | 109.7 | -0.64 | -0.15 | 0.492 | 34.5% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.86 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.04 | 2012 | 1492 | 99.4 | -1.37 | -3.14 | 0.754 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.13 |
| 2006 | 1487 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | -0.10 | 2013 | 1466 | 94.7 | -2.50 | -3.93 | 0.601 | 37.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 2007 | 1612 | 120.9 | +1.44 | -0.59 | 0.989 | 49.5% | +20 | -83 | — | 67.9% | +1.14 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.74 | 2014 | 1452 | 96.0 | -1.11 | -0.95 | 0.738 | 43.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 2008 | 1581 | 112.4 | +0.75 | -3.13 | 0.940 | 48.5% | -27 | +58 | +2 | 45.9% | -0.33 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.4 | +0.83 | 2015 | 1506 | 120.7 | -1.25 | +0.80 | 0.994 | 49.9% | +33 | +3 | — | 42.9% | -0.29 | 4–6 (40%) | 1–5 (17%) | 95.4 | +0.12 |
| 2009 | 1534 | 107.8 | -0.66 | -1.62 | 0.907 | 48.1% | -3 | +30 | — | 38.1% | -0.69 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–4 (43%) | 97.3 | -0.22 | 2016 | 1573 | 118.3 | -1.51 | +0.75 | 0.980 | 49.5% | -19 | -72 | 0 | 43.3% | -0.28 | 4–6 (40%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.8 | +0.17 |
| 2010 | 1444 | 105.5 | -1.26 | -3.39 | 0.883 | 47.3% | +88 | +19 | — | 33.3% | -0.80 | 2–7 (22%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.96 | 2017 | 1747 | 128.4 | +1.44 | +1.85 | 1.073 | 51.3% | -32 | -164 | -110 | 56.6% | +0.29 | 8–3 (73%) | 11–4 (73%) | 113.5 | -1.42 |
| 2011 | 1440 | 104.6 | -0.47 | -2.33 | 0.929 | 48.2% | +40 | +36 | — | 34.1% | -1.32 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–1 (67%) | 97.9 | +0.55 | 2018 | 1543 | 113.1 | -2.34 | -2.79 | 0.867 | 47.2% | +88 | -83 | +65 | 29.4% | -1.12 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.1 | +0.75 |
| 2012 | 1567 | 120.4 | +0.94 | -2.00 | 0.973 | 49.6% | +13 | -61 | — | 47.1% | -0.16 | 4–6 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.4 | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1464 | 92.4 | -3.33 | -3.82 | 0.734 | 43.3% | +53 | -36 | — | 16.7% | -2.42 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1522 | 116.7 | -0.48 | -2.01 | 0.875 | 47.1% | -13 | -8 | — | 39.5% | -0.87 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–2 (50%) | 105.0 | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1460 | 100.1 | -1.71 | -4.00 | 0.797 | 45.3% | +53 | -24 | — | 28.6% | -1.86 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1580 | 120.0 | -0.40 | -0.40 | 0.976 | 49.3% | -22 | -16 | — | 49.2% | -0.27 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–1 (80%) | 102.8 | -1.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1657 | 125.5 | -1.45 | -0.38 | 0.962 | 49.5% | +18 | -74 | — | 46.3% | -0.16 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–9 (18%) | 94.8 | -0.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1684 | 119.2 | -0.79 | -1.64 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -42 | +15 | — | 47.8% | -0.27 | 8–3 (73%) | 5–2 (71%) | 108.1 | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1594 | 114.6 | -1.35 | -2.58 | 0.887 | 47.3% | +33 | -57 | -130 | 32.9% | -0.99 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–6 (33%) | 99.6 | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1540 | 98.6 | -2.06 | -1.56 | 0.767 | 44.0% | — | — | — | 11.1% | -2.22 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1703 | 118.5 | -0.64 | -1.98 | 0.911 | 48.0% | +8 | -5 | -73 | 41.1% | -0.62 | 40–52 (43%) | 28–35 (44%) | 98.1 | -0.04 | Career | 1747 | 122.6 | -0.69 | +0.25 | 0.973 | 49.4% | +13 | -82 | -29 | 43.4% | -0.36 | 18–20 (47%) | 18–21 (46%) | 101.9 | -0.16 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alizé Cornet | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jan 10, 2019 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 2, 2018 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 17, 2019 | H2H |
| Sloane Stephens | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 26, 2019 | H2H |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 3, 2017 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jun 22, 2018 | H2H |
| Evgeniya Rodina | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 19, 2018 | H2H |
| Mona Barthel | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 24, 2018 | H2H |
| Zarina Diyas | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 26, 2018 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 17, 2018 | H2H |