H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Pauline Parmentier vs Casey Dellacqua H2H: 1-1

Pauline Parmentier and Casey Dellacqua are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on grass, while Pauline Parmentier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pauline Parmentier won the 2014 Cincinnati second round 7-6(4) 6-2.

FRA Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 2014* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Pauline Parmentier #81 7-6(4) 6-2 Casey Dellacqua #30 Match data
Jun 26, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Casey Dellacqua #43 1-6 6-2 6-3 Pauline Parmentier #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,702 121 188 39.2% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,761 79 105 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pauline Parmentier Casey Dellacqua
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,490 0 0
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,507 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,473 0 0
20 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,475 0 0
21 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,502 0 0
22 2008 17–20 45.9% #61 1,585 0 2 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,502 0 0
23 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,536 0 2 2008 17–16 51.5% #53 1,618 0 0
24 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,444 0 2 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,587 0 0
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,441 0 2 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,555 0 0
26 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,535 0 0
27 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,465 0 2 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,584 0 0
28 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,523 0 2 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,484 0 0
29 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,460 0 2 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,745 0 0
30 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,580 0 2 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,629 0 0
31 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,656 0 2
32 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,682 0 4
33 2019 12–23 34.3% #123 1,598 0 4
34 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,544 0 4