H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Pauline Parmentier vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 0-3
Flavia Pennetta holds a 3–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Flavia Pennetta leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Flavia Pennetta won the 2009 Acapulco fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2009* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Flavia Pennetta | 6-1 6-3 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2008* | Vina Del Mar | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Flavia Pennetta | 6-2 6-0 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2007* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 6-4 6-4 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pauline Parmentier | Flavia Pennetta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |