H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Pauline Parmentier vs Jie Zheng H2H: 1-1

Pauline Parmentier and Jie Zheng are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jie Zheng leads 1–0 on grass, while Pauline Parmentier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pauline Parmentier won the 2012 Osaka fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pauline Parmentier
FRA Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jie Zheng
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 2012* Osaka WTA 250 R16 Hard Pauline Parmentier #73 6-3 6-4 Jie Zheng #24 Match data
Jun 23, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jie Zheng #24 7-5 6-4 Pauline Parmentier #106 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,702 121 188 39.2% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,898 216 193 52.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pauline Parmentier Jie Zheng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,507 0 0
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,507 0 0 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0
20 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 2004 10–17 37.0% #79 1,551 0 0
21 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,705 0 1
22 2008 17–20 45.9% #61 1,585 0 2 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,778 0 3
23 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,536 0 2 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3
24 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,444 0 2 2008 20–10 66.7% #25 1,838 0 3
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,441 0 2 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,779 0 3
26 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,760 0 3
27 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,465 0 2 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3
28 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,523 0 2 2012 25–23 52.1% #26 1,658 0 4
29 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,460 0 2 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,688 0 4
30 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,580 0 2 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4
31 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,656 0 2 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4
32 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,682 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2019 12–23 34.3% #123 1,598 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,544 0 4 — — — — — — —