H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC

Pauline Parmentier vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-1

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 1–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 2012 Indian Wells first round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pauline Parmentier
FRA Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 6, 2012* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-1 6-3 Pauline Parmentier #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,702 121 188 39.2% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pauline Parmentier Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,507 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2008 17–20 45.9% #61 1,585 0 2 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,536 0 2 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,444 0 2 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,441 0 2 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,465 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,523 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,460 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,580 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,682 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2019 12–23 34.3% #123 1,598 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,544 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8