H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Pauline Parmentier vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-1

Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2005 US Open second round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pauline Parmentier
FRA Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-1 6-1 Pauline Parmentier #253 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,702 121 188 39.2% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pauline Parmentier Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,507 0 0 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2008 17–20 45.9% #61 1,585 0 2 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,536 0 2 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,444 0 2 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,441 0 2 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,465 0 2 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,523 0 2 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,460 0 2 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,580 0 2 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,656 0 2 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,682 0 4 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54
33 2019 12–23 34.3% #123 1,598 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,544 0 4 — — — — — — —