H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pauline Parmentier vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-1

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2011 Acapulco fourth round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pauline Parmentier
FRA Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 25, 2011* Acapulco WTA 250 R16 Clay Lourdes Domínguez Lino #51 6-1 6-1 Pauline Parmentier #111 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,702 121 188 39.2% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pauline Parmentier Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,507 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2008 17–20 45.9% #61 1,585 0 2 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,536 0 2 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,444 0 2 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,441 0 2 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,465 0 2 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,523 0 2 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,460 0 2 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,580 0 2 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,656 0 2 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,682 0 4 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2019 12–23 34.3% #123 1,598 0 4 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,544 0 4 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2