H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pauline Parmentier vs Shuai Peng H2H: 0-3

Shuai Peng holds a 3–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Shuai Peng leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2012 Dallas fourth round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pauline Parmentier
FRA Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 24, 2012* Dallas WTA 250 R16 Hard Shuai Peng #36 6-4 6-2 Pauline Parmentier #93 Match data
May 22, 2009* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Shuai Peng #32 6-3 7-6(6) Pauline Parmentier #77 Match data
Aug 22, 2008* Forest Hills WTA 250 R16 Hard Shuai Peng #53 6-3 6-2 Pauline Parmentier #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,702 121 188 39.2% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pauline Parmentier Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,507 0 0 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0
20 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0
21 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0
22 2008 17–20 45.9% #61 1,585 0 2 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0
23 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,536 0 2 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0
24 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,444 0 2 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,441 0 2 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0
26 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0
27 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,465 0 2 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0
28 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,523 0 2 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0
29 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,460 0 2 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0
30 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,580 0 2 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1
31 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,656 0 2 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2
32 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,682 0 4 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2
33 2019 12–23 34.3% #123 1,598 0 4 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2
34 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,544 0 4 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2