H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Peaches Bartkowicz vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 3-0
Peaches Bartkowicz holds a 3–0 lead over Tory Ann Fretz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Peaches Bartkowicz leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peaches Bartkowicz won the 1970 San Juan semifinal 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 77
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 83
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1970* | San Juan | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Peaches Bartkowicz | 7-6 6-1 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| May 17, 1969* | Hurlingham | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Peaches Bartkowicz | 6-4 9-7 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1968* | Pompano Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Peaches Bartkowicz | (w/o) | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peaches Bartkowicz | — | — | — | 1,973 | 118 | 59 | 66.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peaches Bartkowicz | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 22–9 | 71.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1969 | 48–13 | 78.7% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1970 | 39–17 | 69.6% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1971 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 12 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |