H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Penny Moor vs Joyce Williams H2H: 0-2
Joyce Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Penny Moor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joyce Williams leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Joyce Williams won the 1972 Surbiton third round 7-5 6-8 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1972* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Joyce Williams | 7-5 6-8 6-0 | Penny Moor | Match data |
| May 19, 1972* | Guildford | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Joyce Williams | 6-1 6-1 | Penny Moor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penny Moor | — | — | — | 1,552 | 53 | 111 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joyce Williams | — | — | — | 1,966 | 188 | 88 | 68.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Penny Moor | Joyce Williams | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 9–20 | 31.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 7–21 | 25.0% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 35–20 | 63.6% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 46–17 | 73.0% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 23–12 | 65.7% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 30–8 | 78.9% | — | 1,935 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,395 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,842 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,835 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 11 |