H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Petra Cetkovska vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 1-2
Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 2–1 lead over Petra Cetkovska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2011 Cincinnati second round 2-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2011* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Petra Cetkovska | 2-6 6-2 6-2 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2011* | Palermo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Anabel Medina Garrigues | 7-5 6-3 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anabel Medina Garrigues | 7-6(1) 6-0 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,852 | 310 | 275 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Cetkovska | Anabel Medina Garrigues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,565 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,553 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,501 | 0 | 11 |