H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Petra Cetkovska vs Kimiko Date H2H: 1-0

Petra Cetkovska holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Cetkovska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2011 Osaka round of 32 6-2 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Cetkovska
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Cetkovska #32 6-2 7-6(2) Kimiko Date #85 Match data Oct 13, 2011* R32 Osaka WTA 250 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Petra Cetkovska #954 #25 1,955 1,764 73 82 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Cetkovska Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2007 1–2 33.3% #104 1,501 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2
23 2008 12–15 44.4% #83 1,515 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2009 7–12 36.8% #149 1,510 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5
25 2010 1–1 50.0% #143 1,506 0 0 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7
26 2011 15–9 62.5% #31 1,699 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2012 17–15 53.1% #55 1,721 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2013 5–8 38.5% #139 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2014 13–11 54.2% #58 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 2–6 25.0% #130 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 0–3 0.0% #591 1,596 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Cetkovska Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2010 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2011 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 25 37 62 40.3% 33 29 62 53.2% 14 15 29 48.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Cetkovska Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85
22 2007 1502 107.9 +1.18 -1.62 0.887 47.5% +19 — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 -0.01 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50
23 2008 1515 105.8 -0.98 -0.50 0.986 49.6% -64 +100 +137 42.9% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) +1.55 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12
24 2009 1510 117.6 -1.23 -0.70 0.916 48.1% -18 +85 +96 38.1% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) +0.44 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54
25 2010 1506 96.8 -1.81 -1.04 0.904 48.0% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — +0.33 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14
26 2011 1699 138.0 +2.22 +1.50 1.067 51.2% -59 -79 -25 58.6% +0.67 8–4 (67%) 6–1 (86%) +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1721 128.5 -0.29 +2.74 1.053 51.3% -59 +4 -65 52.9% +0.19 5–3 (63%) 1–2 (33%) -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1648 112.7 -0.14 -0.68 0.975 49.7% -54 +63 -5 46.9% +0.03 1–5 (17%) 1–1 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1697 125.5 -1.77 +0.79 0.971 49.4% -47 +9 -24 49.2% -0.10 8–3 (73%) 2–2 (50%) +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1631 104.2 -2.06 -4.58 0.621 41.8% +18 — — 26.3% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–1 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1596 96.1 -3.10 -4.14 0.449 34.7% +8 — — 0.0% -4.33 — — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16
Career — 1765 125.7 -0.45 +0.40 0.967 49.3% -41 +36 +19 46.7% -0.18 28–21 (57%) 16–14 (53%) +1.40 — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.