H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Petra Cetkovska vs Marion Bartoli H2H: 2-0
Petra Cetkovska holds a 2–0 lead over Marion Bartoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petra Cetkovska leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2011 New Haven quarterfinal 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2011* | New Haven | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Petra Cetkovska | 7-5 7-5 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2008* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Petra Cetkovska | 5-7 6-4 6-0 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Cetkovska | Marion Bartoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |