H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Petra Cetkovska vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-1

Petra Cetkovska and Tamira Paszek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2011 China Open round of 32 1-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Cetkovska
Czech Republic Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamira Paszek 1-6 6-4 6-2 Petra Cetkovska #32 Match data Oct 6, 2011* R32 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Petra Cetkovska #70 4-6 6-3 4-1 (ret.) Tamira Paszek Match data Aug 14, 2008* R32 Cincinnati Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Cetkovska #954 #25 1,955 1,764 73 82 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Cetkovska Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 — — — — — — — 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 — — — — — — — 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2007 1–2 33.3% #104 1,501 0 0 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2008 12–15 44.4% #83 1,515 0 0 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2009 7–12 36.8% #149 1,510 0 0 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2010 1–1 50.0% #143 1,506 0 0 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2011 15–9 62.5% #31 1,699 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2012 17–15 53.1% #55 1,721 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2013 5–8 38.5% #139 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2014 13–11 54.2% #58 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 2–6 25.0% #130 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 0–3 0.0% #591 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Cetkovska Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2011 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 25 37 62 40.3% 33 29 62 53.2% 14 15 29 48.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 129/155 of Petra Cetkovska's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Petra Cetkovska Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2007 2/3 2.5 2.5 71.1% 60.4% 31.3% 65.0% 45.0% 52.0% 42.5% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2008 21/27 1.6 3.9 65.5% 60.6% 44.3% 45.1% 51.7% 54.7% 44.6% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2009 16/19 1.0 5.3 63.0% 59.8% 42.7% 47.3% 47.1% 53.3% 42.7% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2010 2/2 2.5 4.5 60.2% 56.7% 37.9% 45.8% 52.4% 49.3% 45.8% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2011 22/24 2.0 5.8 60.3% 64.2% 47.4% 49.8% 56.1% 57.6% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 26/32 1.6 4.8 63.8% 63.7% 39.5% 52.2% 50.3% 55.1% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 11/13 2.3 4.1 59.5% 63.3% 45.1% 58.3% 46.8% 55.9% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 21/24 2.0 4.7 61.0% 60.0% 42.7% 44.8% 54.7% 52.9% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 5/8 2.2 6.4 61.8% 59.8% 45.2% 39.3% 25.0% 54.6% 28.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 3/3 1.7 4.7 57.9% 49.3% 34.2% 34.7% 0.0% 43.5% 25.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129/155 1.8 4.8 62.4% 61.5% 43.0% 48.5% 49.3% 54.5% 44.0% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Cetkovska Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2007 1502 107.9 +1.18 -1.62 0.887 47.5% +19 — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2008 1515 105.8 -0.98 -0.50 0.986 49.6% -64 +100 +137 42.9% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 98.4 +1.00 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2009 1510 117.6 -1.23 -0.70 0.916 48.1% -18 +85 +95 38.1% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +0.14 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2010 1506 96.8 -1.81 -1.04 0.904 48.0% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.34 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2011 1699 138.0 +2.22 +1.50 1.067 51.2% -59 -79 -25 58.6% +0.67 8–4 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 110.6 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1721 128.5 -0.29 +2.74 1.053 51.3% -59 +4 -65 52.9% +0.19 5–3 (63%) 1–2 (33%) 102.2 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1648 112.7 -0.14 -0.68 0.975 49.7% -54 +63 -5 46.9% +0.03 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1697 125.5 -1.77 +0.79 0.971 49.4% -47 +10 -24 49.2% -0.10 8–3 (73%) 2–2 (50%) 106.0 +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1631 104.2 -2.06 -4.58 0.621 41.8% +18 — — 26.3% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1596 96.1 -3.10 -4.13 0.449 34.7% +8 — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1765 125.6 -0.45 +0.40 0.967 49.3% -41 +36 +19 46.7% -0.18 28–21 (57%) 16–14 (53%) 107.8 +1.03 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.