H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Petra Cetkovska vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-1
Petra Cetkovska and Tamira Paszek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2011 Beijing third round 1-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data | Oct 6, 2011* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard |
| Petra Cetkovska | 4-6 6-3 4-1 (ret.) | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Aug 14, 2008* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,764 | 73 | 82 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Cetkovska | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #55 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |