H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Petra Cetkovska vs Vania King H2H: 1-0

Petra Cetkovska holds a 1–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Cetkovska leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2012 Wimbledon round of 128 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Cetkovska
Czech Republic Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Cetkovska #25 6-4 6-2 Vania King #61 Match data Jun 27, 2012* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Cetkovska #954 #25 1,955 1,764 73 82 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Cetkovska Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1
22 2007 1–2 33.3% #104 1,501 0 0 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1
23 2008 12–15 44.4% #83 1,515 0 0 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1
24 2009 7–12 36.8% #149 1,510 0 0 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2010 1–1 50.0% #143 1,506 0 0 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2011 15–9 62.5% #31 1,699 0 0 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2012 17–15 53.1% #55 1,721 0 0 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2013 5–8 38.5% #139 1,647 0 0 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 2014 13–11 54.2% #58 1,697 0 0 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1
30 2015 2–6 25.0% #130 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 0–3 0.0% #591 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Cetkovska Vania King
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2011 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2015 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 25 37 62 40.3% 33 29 62 53.2% 14 15 29 48.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 129/155 of Petra Cetkovska's and 237/288 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Petra Cetkovska Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/36 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 2007 2/3 2.5 2.5 71.1% 60.4% 31.3% 65.0% 45.0% 52.0% 42.5% 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 2008 21/27 1.6 3.9 65.5% 60.6% 44.3% 45.1% 51.7% 54.7% 44.6% 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2009 16/19 1.0 5.3 63.0% 59.8% 42.7% 47.3% 47.1% 53.3% 42.7% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2010 2/2 2.5 4.5 60.2% 56.7% 37.9% 45.8% 52.4% 49.3% 45.8% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2011 22/24 2.0 5.8 60.3% 64.2% 47.4% 49.8% 56.1% 57.6% 45.3% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 2012 26/32 1.6 4.8 63.8% 63.7% 39.5% 52.2% 50.3% 55.1% 47.3% 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2013 11/13 2.3 4.1 59.5% 63.3% 45.1% 58.3% 46.8% 55.9% 43.0% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 2014 21/24 2.0 4.7 61.0% 60.0% 42.7% 44.8% 54.7% 52.9% 45.7% 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
30 2015 5/8 2.2 6.4 61.8% 59.8% 45.2% 39.3% 25.0% 54.6% 28.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 3/3 1.7 4.7 57.9% 49.3% 34.2% 34.7% 0.0% 43.5% 25.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129/155 1.8 4.8 62.4% 61.5% 43.0% 48.5% 49.3% 54.5% 44.0% — 237/288 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Cetkovska Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +16 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.4 -1.23
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1519 117.6 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -1.09
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.36
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.43
22 2007 1502 107.9 +1.18 -1.62 0.887 47.5% +19 — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 2008 1515 105.8 -0.98 -0.50 0.986 49.6% -64 +100 +137 42.9% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 98.4 +1.00 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -46 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2009 1510 117.6 -1.23 -0.70 0.916 48.1% -18 +85 +95 38.1% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +0.14 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2010 1506 96.8 -1.81 -1.04 0.904 48.0% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.34 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +18 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2011 1699 138.0 +2.22 +1.50 1.067 51.2% -59 -79 -25 58.6% +0.67 8–4 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 110.6 +0.37 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
27 2012 1721 128.5 -0.29 +2.74 1.053 51.3% -59 +4 -65 52.9% +0.19 5–3 (63%) 1–2 (33%) 102.2 -0.19 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2013 1648 112.7 -0.14 -0.68 0.975 49.7% -54 +63 -5 46.9% +0.03 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — -0.22 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16
29 2014 1697 125.5 -1.77 +0.79 0.971 49.4% -47 +10 -24 49.2% -0.10 8–3 (73%) 2–2 (50%) 106.0 +0.29 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +6 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17
30 2015 1631 104.2 -2.06 -4.58 0.621 41.8% +18 — — 26.3% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.26 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1596 96.1 -3.10 -4.13 0.449 34.7% +8 — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1765 125.6 -0.45 +0.40 0.967 49.3% -41 +36 +19 46.7% -0.18 28–21 (57%) 16–14 (53%) 107.8 +1.03 — 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +17 -80 -68 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 104.0 -1.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.