H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Petra Cetkovska vs Yvonne Meusburger H2H: 0-2
Yvonne Meusburger holds a 2–0 lead over Petra Cetkovska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yvonne Meusburger leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yvonne Meusburger won the 2014 Marrakech third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2014* | Marrakech | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Yvonne Meusburger | 6-3 6-3 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2013* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Yvonne Meusburger | 7-5 6-4 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yvonne Meusburger | #93 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,706 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Cetkovska | Yvonne Meusburger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #143 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #49 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |