Petra Delhees Jauch
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruzici | 0 | 7 | 7 | Oct 27, 1983 | H2H |
| Rosie Casals | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 10, 1985 | H2H |
| Susan Mascarin | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 5, 1985 | H2H |
| Eva Pfaff | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 8, 1983 | H2H |
| Sabina Simmonds | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 25, 1983 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Petra Delhees Jauch vs Etsuko Inoue H2H: 0-1
Etsuko Inoue holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Delhees Jauch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Etsuko Inoue leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Etsuko Inoue won the 1984 Palm Beach round of 64 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | 6-3 6-4 | Petra Delhees Jauch | Match data | Mar 14, 1984* | R64 | Palm Beach | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Delhees Jauch | — | — | — | 1,719 | 69 | 91 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 133 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Petra Delhees Jauch | Etsuko Inoue | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #52 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Petra Delhees Jauch | Etsuko Inoue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1975 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1983 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1985 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1986 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1981 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1987 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 1982 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1988 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1983 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1989 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1984 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1985 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 37 | 46 | 83 | 44.6% | 6 | 16 | 22 | 27.3% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | Career | 57 | 67 | 124 | 46.0% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 35 | 34 | 69 | 50.7% | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Petra Delhees Jauch | Etsuko Inoue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1975 | 1484 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.26 | 1980 | 1488 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 1976 | 1467 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.67 | — | — | — | -0.17 | 1981 | 1483 | 100.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.02 |
| 1977 | 1450 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.42 | 1982 | 1523 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | +58 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.09 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.31 |
| 1978 | 1533 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +53 | -9 | 39.1% | -0.96 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.07 | 1983 | 1642 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -38 | -81 | 52.9% | +0.06 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–0 | — | +1.48 |
| 1979 | 1652 | 121.1 | — | — | — | — | -19 | -54 | -125 | 54.8% | +0.14 | 5–1 (83%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.87 | 1984 | 1700 | 134.3 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -31 | -114 | 50.6% | +0.12 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–5 (38%) | 98.1 | +0.10 |
| 1980 | 1580 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -12 | — | 35.9% | -0.79 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.8 | +1.16 | 1985 | 1633 | 117.6 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +12 | -71 | 41.3% | -0.66 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.4 | +0.47 |
| 1981 | 1584 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +12 | -38 | 42.1% | -0.21 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.4 | +0.74 | 1986 | 1636 | 124.5 | — | — | — | — | -97 | — | +70 | 42.6% | -0.57 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.2 | -0.52 |
| 1982 | 1619 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | -48 | -27 | -57 | 41.7% | -0.78 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.1 | -2.23 | 1987 | 1765 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | -109 | — | +24 | 59.0% | +0.54 | 4–9 (31%) | 3–1 (75%) | 97.8 | +0.20 |
| 1983 | 1673 | 122.9 | — | — | — | — | -58 | +21 | — | 48.5% | -0.05 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–4 (33%) | 101.7 | +0.98 | 1988 | 1703 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | -74 | — | +78 | 48.4% | -0.06 | 4–8 (33%) | 5–2 (71%) | 97.7 | -0.96 |
| 1984 | 1641 | 109.6 | — | — | — | — | -12 | -25 | — | 36.7% | -1.13 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | -0.15 | 1989 | 1670 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | -24 | — | +87 | 47.4% | -0.14 | 4–8 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.43 |
| 1985 | 1705 | 132.4 | — | — | — | — | -86 | +6 | — | 56.5% | +0.17 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -1.26 | 1990 | 1661 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | +100 | 49.2% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–1 (83%) | 104.2 | -0.07 |
| Career | 1719 | 129.5 | — | — | — | — | -42 | +2 | -58 | 44.1% | -0.47 | 18–24 (43%) | 12–16 (43%) | 99.0 | +0.43 | Career | 1803 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | -33 | -20 | +14 | 49.1% | -0.11 | 32–49 (40%) | 25–17 (60%) | 99.0 | +0.19 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Etsuko Inoue
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | 3 | 5 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 6 | 6 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 4, 1989 | H2H |