H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Petra Delhees Jauch vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-0

Petra Delhees Jauch holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Delhees Jauch leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Delhees Jauch won the 1985 Barcelona round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Delhees Jauch

SUI

H2H

1 – 0

1 main-draw meetings

Nathalie Herreman

FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Petra Delhees Jauch	6-3 6-2	Nathalie Herreman	Match data	May 9, 1985*	R32	Barcelona	WTA 250	Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Petra Delhees Jauch	—	—	—	1,719	69	91	43.1%	0	0	0	0	1	1
Nathalie Herreman	#886	#42	20	1,727	103	154	40.1%	0	0	0	0	1	1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Petra Delhees Jauch							Nathalie Herreman
Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
1975	0–1	0.0%	—	1,483	0	0	1982	0–1	0.0%	—	1,492	0	0
1976	0–3	0.0%	—	1,466	0	0	1983	4–3	57.1%	—	1,547	0	0
1977	0–1	0.0%	—	1,450	0	0	1984	8–12	40.0%	#125	1,563	0	0
1978	6–6	50.0%	—	1,533	0	0	1985	3–6	33.3%	#126	1,542	0	0
1979	12–8	60.0%	—	1,652	0	1	1986	16–11	59.3%	#42	1,717	0	1
1980	5–12	29.4%	—	1,579	0	1	1987	11–20	35.5%	#91	1,640	0	1
1981	6–10	37.5%	—	1,583	0	1	1988	8–12	40.0%	#95	1,605	0	1
1982	10–17	37.0%	—	1,618	0	1	1989	8–17	32.0%	#134	1,568	0	1
1983	15–15	50.0%	—	1,673	0	1	1990	19–20	48.7%	#62	1,683	0	1
1984	4–9	30.8%	—	1,641	0	1	1991	12–21	36.4%	#121	1,618	0	1
1985	11–9	55.0%	—	1,704	0	1	1992	6–16	27.3%	#183	1,556	0	1
—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	7–9	43.8%	#107	1,623	0	1
—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1994	1–5	16.7%	#181	1,584	0	1
—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	0–1	0.0%	#386	1,580	0	1

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Petra Delhees Jauch																	Nathalie Herreman
Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
1975	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
1976	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1983	—	—	—	—	2	1	3	66.7%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
1977	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1984	4	4	8	50.0%	3	5	8	37.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%
1978	—	—	—	—	5	2	7	71.4%	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	1985	—	—	—	—	2	5	7	28.6%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%
1979	1	1	2	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	3	4	25.0%	3	1	4	75.0%	1986	1	3	4	25.0%	9	4	13	69.2%	1	1	2	50.0%	5	3	8	62.5%
1980	0	1	1	0.0%	3	6	9	33.3%	—	—	—	—	2	5	7	28.6%	1987	5	6	11	45.5%	5	9	14	35.7%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	3	4	25.0%
1981	—	—	—	—	5	7	12	41.7%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	1988	4	4	8	50.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
1982	1	3	4	25.0%	5	6	11	45.5%	2	5	7	28.6%	2	3	5	40.0%	1989	6	7	13	46.2%	1	6	7	14.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%
1983	6	5	11	54.5%	7	7	14	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1990	11	10	21	52.4%	4	5	9	44.4%	3	2	5	60.0%	1	3	4	25.0%
1984	3	2	5	60.0%	1	6	7	14.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1991	4	11	15	26.7%	3	5	8	37.5%	1	2	3	33.3%	4	3	7	57.1%
1985	1	2	3	33.3%	10	7	17	58.8%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1992	1	4	5	20.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	0	2	2	0.0%	4	5	9	44.4%
—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	5	7	12	41.7%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1994	0	3	3	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	12	14	26	46.2%	37	46	83	44.6%	6	16	22	27.3%	8	13	21	38.1%	Career	41	59	100	41.0%	34	55	89	38.2%	8	16	24	33.3%	20	24	44	45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Petra Delhees Jauch																Nathalie Herreman
Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
1975	1484	96.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.00	—	—	—	+0.26	1982	1492	99.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-2.00	—	—	—	-0.01
1976	1467	98.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.67	—	—	—	-0.17	1983	1548	103.2	—	—	—	—	—	+61	—	50.0%	-0.31	2–0	1–0	—	+0.65
1977	1450	96.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.50	—	—	—	+0.42	1984	1564	106.0	—	—	—	—	+9	+37	—	41.9%	-0.81	1–2 (33%)	1–2 (33%)	97.3	+1.16
1978	1533	116.6	—	—	—	—	—	+53	-9	39.1%	-0.96	2–1 (67%)	1–1	—	+0.07	1985	1543	100.6	—	—	—	—	—	-28	—	40.0%	-1.30	0–2	—	—	+0.91
1979	1652	121.1	—	—	—	—	-19	-54	-125	54.8%	+0.14	5–1 (83%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.87	1986	1718	137.8	—	—	—	—	-77	-14	—	62.1%	+0.93	2–4 (33%)	2–3 (40%)	100.4	+1.39
1980	1580	121.7	—	—	—	—	-25	-12	—	35.9%	-0.79	1–4 (20%)	1–4 (20%)	94.8	+1.16	1987	1641	121.1	—	—	—	—	-12	-7	—	40.8%	-0.90	2–7 (22%)	5–2 (71%)	95.4	+0.60
1981	1584	118.5	—	—	—	—	—	+12	-38	42.1%	-0.21	2–4 (33%)	1–3 (25%)	97.4	+0.74	1988	1606	116.4	—	—	—	—	+37	-63	-63	46.2%	-0.48	4–8 (33%)	0–1	—	+0.90
1982	1619	133.1	—	—	—	—	-48	-27	-57	41.7%	-0.78	1–5 (17%)	4–1 (80%)	99.1	-2.23	1989	1568	127.3	—	—	—	—	+91	-64	—	36.4%	-0.73	1–4 (20%)	0–6 (0%)	92.4	-0.56
1983	1673	122.9	—	—	—	—	-58	+21	—	48.5%	-0.05	4–2 (67%)	2–4 (33%)	101.7	+0.98	1990	1683	140.3	—	—	—	—	+41	-156	-113	48.3%	-0.24	5–4 (56%)	2–2 (50%)	103.4	-1.70
1984	1641	109.6	—	—	—	—	-12	-25	—	36.7%	-1.13	1–3 (25%)	1–0	—	-0.15	1991	1618	118.4	—	—	—	—	+27	-109	-32	38.7%	-0.83	4–5 (44%)	3–2 (60%)	100.4	-0.07
1985	1705	132.4	—	—	—	—	-86	+6	—	56.5%	+0.17	2–4 (33%)	1–1	—	-1.26	1992	1556	118.1	—	—	—	—	+62	-82	—	34.7%	-1.06	0–5 (0%)	0–1	—	-0.27
—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	1623	124.9	—	—	—	—	+8	-99	—	41.2%	-1.18	2–0	1–0	—	-0.45
—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1994	1585	103.8	—	—	—	—	+19	-41	—	21.4%	-3.00	1–1	1–0	—	-0.34
—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	1581	100.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.50	—	—	—	-0.22
Career	1719	129.5	—	—	—	—	-42	+2	-58	44.1%	-0.47	18–24 (43%)	12–16 (43%)	99.0	+0.43	Career	1727	129.0	—	—	—	—	+25	-47	-76	42.9%	-0.64	24–42 (36%)	16–19 (46%)	93.0	+0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Petra Delhees Jauch's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Virginia Ruzici	0	7	7	Oct 27, 1983	H2H
Rosie Casals	1	2	3	Apr 10, 1985	H2H
Susan Mascarin	1	2	3	Apr 5, 1985	H2H
Eva Pfaff	0	3	3	Jul 8, 1983	H2H
Sabina Simmonds	1	2	3	May 25, 1983	H2H

Nathalie Herreman's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Rosalyn Fairbank	4	2	6	Aug 4, 1993	H2H
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel	3	2	5	Jun 26, 1991	H2H
Zina Garrison	0	5	5	Aug 10, 1990	H2H
Hana Mandlikova	1	4	5	Mar 8, 1990	H2H
Conchita Martínez	0	4	4	Aug 5, 1993	H2H