H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Petra Huber vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 2-0

Petra Huber holds a 2–0 lead over Debbie Spence Nasim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petra Huber leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Huber won the 1985 US Open round of 128 7-6(3) 6-1.

H2H
2 0
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Huber 7-6(3) 6-1 Debbie Spence Nasim Match data Aug 29, 1985* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Petra Huber #61 1-6 6-4 6-1 Debbie Spence Nasim Match data Dec 13, 1984* R32 Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Huber #458 #37 13 1,737 58 79 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Debbie Spence Nasim 1,827 56 62 47.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Huber Debbie Spence Nasim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1983 4–2 66.7% 1,565 0 0
16 1982 4–2 66.7% 1,563 0 1 1984 9–7 56.2% 1,649 0 1
17 1983 4–6 40.0% 1,596 0 1 1985 25–19 56.8% 1,777 0 1
18 1984 12–14 46.2% #48 1,652 0 1 1986 13–22 37.1% 1,619 0 1
19 1985 10–15 40.0% #53 1,631 0 1 1987 4–11 26.7% 1,554 0 1
20 1986 14–14 50.0% #63 1,625 0 2
21 1987 11–14 44.0% #84 1,652 0 2 1989 1–1 50.0% 1,557 0 1
22 1988 3–13 18.8% #178 1,519 0 2
23 1989 0–1 0.0% #444 1,514 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Huber Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1983 4 2 6 66.7%
16 1982 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 8 8 16 50.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1985 1 6 7 14.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1988 0 4 4 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
23 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 10 27 37 27.0% 45 41 86 52.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 26 27 53 49.1% 25 20 45 55.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 11 16 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Huber Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1983 1565 107.6 +78 61.5% +0.38 1–0 2–0 +0.32
16 1982 1564 115.4 +61 60.0% +1.70 0–1 +0.15 1984 1649 120.5 +26 -52 55.0% +0.22 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.8 +0.47
17 1983 1597 121.2 -52 +132 45.8% -0.54 1–3 (25%) +0.57 1985 1777 141.5 -50 -20 54.7% +0.34 7–4 (64%) 3–6 (33%) 103.0 -1.69
18 1984 1653 126.1 -47 +62 46.8% +0.15 5–5 (50%) 1–1 +1.10 1986 1619 116.9 -1 +131 -90 35.5% -1.12 5–1 (83%) 3–3 (50%) 105.9 +0.57
19 1985 1631 127.0 -93 +117 40.4% -0.21 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 100.6 +0.22 1987 1555 115.2 +10 +132 29.0% -1.77 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) -0.23
20 1986 1626 120.8 -93 +110 50.8% -0.03 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 99.5 +1.87
21 1987 1652 141.2 -127 +79 47.4% -0.19 2–5 (29%) 4–2 (67%) 97.3 -1.91 1989 1558 101.4 66.7% +2.33 1–0 0–1 +0.20
22 1988 1520 111.0 -64 +79 29.7% -1.40 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) -0.13
23 1989 1515 100.5 0.0% -3.50 -0.23
Career 1737 132.3 -76 +93 44.6% -0.22 16–26 (38%) 10–12 (45%) 94.8 +1.20 1827 129.7 -4 +41 -90 46.5% -0.34 20–10 (67%) 12–13 (48%) 107.8 -0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.