H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Petra Kamstra vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 1-1
Petra Kamstra and Naoko Sawamatsu are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petra Kamstra leads 1–0 on grass, while Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Kamstra won the 1995 Wimbledon third round 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 53
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Petra Kamstra | 6-1 7-6 | Naoko Sawamatsu | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1991* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Naoko Sawamatsu | 4-6 5-0 (ret.) | Petra Kamstra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Kamstra | #425 | #70 | 90 | 1,585 | 21 | 36 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | #266 | #14 | 881 | 1,971 | 182 | 127 | 58.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Kamstra | Naoko Sawamatsu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #128 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #31 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #28 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #76 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1996 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #55 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |