H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Petra Langrova vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-2
Ann Grossman holds a 2–0 lead over Petra Langrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ann Grossman leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1997 Amelia Island second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 56
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1997* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Ann Grossman | 6-2 6-4 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
| May 26, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Ann Grossman | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Langrova | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |