H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Petra Langrova vs Federica Bonsignori H2H: 3-0
Petra Langrova holds a 3–0 lead over Federica Bonsignori in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Petra Langrova leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Langrova won the 1992 Palermo fourth round 6-2 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1992* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Petra Langrova | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
| May 23, 1991* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Petra Langrova | 3-6 6-3 6-0 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1989* | Sofia | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Petra Langrova | 7-6 6-2 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Federica Bonsignori | #813 | #28 | 30 | 1,709 | 75 | 112 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Langrova | Federica Bonsignori | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #144 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #142 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #143 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #50 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #211 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |