H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Petra Langrova vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 0-4
Leila Meskhi holds a 4–0 lead over Petra Langrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1994 Paris fourth round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 56
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1994* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 7-5 6-0 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1993* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Leila Meskhi | 7-5 3-6 7-5 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1992* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 6-7 6-1 6-2 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1990* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 4-6 6-2 7-6 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Langrova | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |