H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Petra Langrova vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 0-1
Nathalie Herreman holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Langrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1989 Brisbane second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 56
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1989* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Nathalie Herreman | 6-2 6-1 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Langrova | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |