Petra Langrova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cecchini | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 24, 1997 | H2H |
| Veronika Martinek | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 17, 1997 | H2H |
| Judith Wiesner | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 1, 1996 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 2, 1996 | H2H |
| Leila Meskhi | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 19, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Nathalie Herreman holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Langrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1989 Brisbane International round of 64 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Herreman | 6-2 6-1 | Petra Langrova | Match data | Jan 4, 1989* | R64 | Brisbane International | WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,700 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,727 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Langrova | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Petra Langrova | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 1988 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1984 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 19 | 1989 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1990 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 21 | 1991 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1987 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 1992 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1988 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1993 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1989 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 1994 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1990 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 25 | 1995 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 26 | 1996 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 27 | 1997 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 16 | 33 | 49 | 32.7% | 54 | 63 | 117 | 46.2% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | — | 41 | 59 | 100 | 41.0% | 34 | 55 | 89 | 38.2% | 8 | 16 | 24 | 33.3% | 20 | 24 | 44 | 45.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Petra Langrova | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1492 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1548 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +61 | — | 50.0% | -0.31 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.65 |
| 18 | 1988 | 1581 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +77 | — | 62.5% | +0.50 | 2–0 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +1.11 | 1984 | 1564 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +37 | — | 41.9% | -0.81 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 97.3 | +1.16 |
| 19 | 1989 | 1621 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | -125 | +103 | — | 43.9% | -0.59 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–4 (60%) | 102.8 | +0.67 | 1985 | 1543 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | -28 | — | 40.0% | -1.30 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.91 |
| 20 | 1990 | 1616 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -72 | +52 | — | 47.6% | -0.25 | 3–6 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.6 | -0.15 | 1986 | 1718 | 137.8 | — | — | — | — | -77 | -14 | — | 62.1% | +0.93 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.4 | +1.39 |
| 21 | 1991 | 1597 | 128.3 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +40 | — | 40.3% | -0.51 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–4 (20%) | 101.3 | +0.13 | 1987 | 1641 | 121.1 | — | — | — | — | -12 | -7 | — | 40.8% | -0.90 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–2 (71%) | 95.4 | +0.60 |
| 22 | 1992 | 1562 | 116.3 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +55 | — | 40.4% | -0.72 | 6–7 (46%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.3 | +0.27 | 1988 | 1606 | 116.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -63 | -63 | 46.2% | -0.48 | 4–8 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.90 |
| 23 | 1993 | 1559 | 114.9 | — | — | — | — | +30 | +27 | — | 45.0% | -0.57 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 99.5 | -0.13 | 1989 | 1568 | 127.3 | — | — | — | — | +91 | -64 | — | 36.4% | -0.73 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–6 (0%) | 92.4 | -0.56 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1568 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | -26 | +63 | — | 43.2% | -0.95 | 3–6 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.21 | 1990 | 1683 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | +41 | -156 | -113 | 48.3% | -0.24 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–2 (50%) | 103.4 | -1.70 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1572 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +25 | — | 40.5% | -0.51 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.06 | 1991 | 1618 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -109 | -32 | 38.7% | -0.83 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.4 | -0.07 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1626 | 114.6 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -13 | — | 53.3% | +0.07 | 4–2 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.08 | 1992 | 1556 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | +62 | -82 | — | 34.7% | -1.06 | 0–5 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.27 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1523 | 109.5 | — | — | — | — | +46 | +26 | — | 26.3% | -1.79 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.21 | 1993 | 1623 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -99 | — | 41.2% | -1.18 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.45 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1509 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -3.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | 1994 | 1585 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -41 | — | 21.4% | -3.00 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.34 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1581 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.22 |
| Career | — | 1701 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -24 | +47 | — | 42.9% | -0.60 | 32–37 (46%) | 18–22 (45%) | 98.9 | +1.20 | — | 1727 | 129.0 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -47 | -76 | 42.9% | -0.64 | 24–42 (36%) | 16–19 (46%) | 93.0 | +0.77 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cecchini | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 24, 1997 | H2H |
| Veronika Martinek | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 17, 1997 | H2H |
| Judith Wiesner | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 1, 1996 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 2, 1996 | H2H |
| Leila Meskhi | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 4 | 2 | 6 | Aug 4, 1993 | H2H |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 10, 1990 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 5, 1993 | H2H |