H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Petra Langrova vs Patricia Tarabini H2H: 2-1
Petra Langrova holds a 2–1 lead over Patricia Tarabini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Petra Langrova leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Petra Langrova won the 1995 British Clay Court Champs third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 56
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1995* | British Clay Court Champs | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Petra Langrova | 6-2 7-5 | Patricia Tarabini | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1990* | Paris | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Patricia Tarabini | 6-4 6-3 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1989* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Petra Langrova | 7-6 6-0 | Patricia Tarabini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Patricia Tarabini | #617 | #29 | 29 | 1,743 | 104 | 122 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Langrova | Patricia Tarabini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #108 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #65 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #36 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #60 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #126 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #104 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |